Authoritarianism, Democracy, and Soccer Cities
I am resuming my irregular Soccernomics blogging. One of the fun insights of the book is that no soccer club from any capital of a democratic country has ever won the European cup. The exception is Real Madrid which gained its status under fascism (the club was always strongly associated with Franco). Benfica from Lisbon also did very well under dictatorship. Instead, in democracies, the cup has largely been won by teams from industrial cities, such as Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool, Nottingham, Milan, Munich, Eindhoven, Marseille, and Turin.No team from Paris or London has ever won. More generally, in authoritarian states, teams from the capital (and government seat) tend to win national titles with much greater regularity than in democracies.
Their explanation is a mix of resources (mostly coming from the state in authoritarian states but from the private sector in market democracies), capture (the state tended to interfere in the success of capital city teams in authoriarian states whereas industrials did so in democracies), and attention (not much else to do for fun in industrial towns). They also argue that this is all about to change as clubs are increasingly being financed by globe-trotting billionaires.
I am not sure if parallels exist to other regions (Latin America?) or aspects of social life. If it is true that authoritarian governments have tended to privilige investment in capital cities more than democracies, it would be interesting to see if these legacies persist once states become democratic. Any way, fun stuff to ponder.
ps. The authors have to make an exception for AJAX Amsterdam, which has won the cup four times. While Amsterdam is the Dutch capital, the government seat is in The Hague, which has had a dreadful team. Moreover, PSV Eindhoven, a team from a small industrial (Philips) city has also won the cup and has won more national titles in recent years than AJAX.
Comments
Interesting. Does the result hold for domestic competitions as well? In China, for example, the soccer club from the capital city Beijing has done fairly poorly—-it only won the Chinese league once (in 2009), and even this victory was marred by allegations of bribes.
Posted by: domestic leagues | January 30, 2010 05:42 PM
No, it doesn’t hold for domestic cup competitions at all; nor does it hold for the UEFA Cup or its predecessors.
Posted by: Trey | January 30, 2010 08:00 PM
There are of course only a few clubs that have won the European Cup so the whole nice theory could just be a nice historical accident. They do actually make some claims about national competitions with some anecdotal illustrations. One other thought I had is that authoritarian states rarely name cities like Bonn or the Hague as capital, which could partially be driving things.
Posted by: Erik | January 31, 2010 06:49 AM
What about Chelsea and Arsenal?
Posted by: claudia | January 31, 2010 04:51 PM
Neither Chelsea nor Arsenal have ever won the European Cup, although both have made it to the final.
Posted by: Trey | January 31, 2010 09:38 PM
To marketplace in footings of quality rather than monetary value, and in order to specialize consequently, you necessitate to follow the standard format of the 4 Ps marketing plan. That is, Price, Product, Place and Promotion evidently you cognize the crucial attributes of the merchandise, and the price, but for place you should consider approximately the type of mass who are willing to pay over 4x price of competing product whereas the cheap option may be sold where emphasis is on cost, your product will be suited to places/distributors where the customers will be willing to pay for quality. Thank you for this article! I’ve just detected a really stunning news site about panda marketing Judge it!
Posted by: Vern Mottershead | February 1, 2010 10:22 AM
How do you finesse the fact that Real Madrid has won the cup since Spain became a democracy?
Posted by: Jim Bach | February 1, 2010 11:13 AM