Look away, John McCain
Down in Dixieland last night, John McCain looked away.
Numerous commentators on TV, in the print media, and in the blogosphere have noted McCain’s steadfast avoidance of eye contact with Barack Obama during the first presidential debate. And because every detail of the debaters’ performance gets subjected to intensive scrutiny, they wonder what to make of McCain’s disinclination to look Obama in the eye.
Maybe McCain is just a shy guy? (Shy people avoid eye contact.) That would be an aspect of his personality that had passed unnoticed until now. At least insofar as I’m aware, no one has ever accused John McCain of being a shrinking violet.
Or perhaps it was a signal of McCain’s contempt for Obama, and/or a manifestation of some deep-seated tendency on McCain’s part to demonize his opponents? That possibility was raised by Chris Matthews and Eugene Robinson in their post-mortem discussion of the debate, here.
Attached to the clip you’ve just watched is another interpretation, drawn from research on animal behavior. Ethologists have discovered that in the animal world, eye contact is a sign of dominance and the avoidance thereof is a sign of submission. That’s why, if you meet a bear in the woods and you don’t have Sarah Palin along to blow him away, you’re supposed to avoid eye contact with said bear; otherwise he is likely to perceive you as a threat, and that just cannot be a good thing.
Anyway, look at reader TB’s comment: “I study monkey behavior — low ranking monkeys don’t look at high ranking monkeys. In a physical, instinctive sense, Obama owned McCain tonight …” Ethologists like TB have indeed compiled a great deal of evidence about the hierarchical meaning and implications of eye contact. Their findings can’t simply be extrapolated to human behavior. But we humans are, after all, animals, so this isn’t as far-fetched as it may initially seem.
Here’s a little light background reading for you on the subject of eye contact, so that if somebody wants to engage you in a conversation about the debate you’ll have something to say. Note, for example, that “In Western culture eye contact is usually a sign of confidence, of interest in the conversation, of openness and frankness.” Presumably, then, the avoidance of eye contact is usually a sign of lack of confidence, of lack of interest in the conversation, and/or of lack of openness and frankness. Of course, what is “usually” the case may not be true in any particular case. Maybe there’s another explanation altogether for McCain’s lack of eye contact. But now you’re equipped to bring up the idea that McCain may have been cowed by the occasion or by Obama, or that he wasn’t interested in the conversation in the first place (and bear in mind that he decided to participate only late in the day), or that — perish the thought for a politician! — he wasn’t being completely open or frank in his answers.
Comments
I’ve read this stuff about ‘monkey behavior’ on the TPM blog and elsewhere. Seems reasonable for monkeys, and I believe in evolution. However, is there not a simpler explanation? McCain, in most voters’ minds, has passed the commander-in-chief bar in terms of the way he looks. To many voters, due to Obama’s youth, or race, or otherwise, has not passed the CinC ‘visual’ test. By not making eye contact, McCain has not elevated Obama to ‘being on the same stage.’ I think it was a McCain campaign tactic to say Obama is not presidential. It may have backfired though, given the coverage (much like Gore’s sighing in 2000).
Presidential candidates are more rational than monkeys, and often do things that are best explained by Occam’s razor: a campaign tactic and not a biological-psychological evolutionary story.
Posted by: Chris | September 27, 2008 03:01 PM
Chris:
(1) I’m not certain what a commander in chief is supposed to look like. FDR? Truman? Eisenhower? Kennedy? Johnson? Nixon? Ford? Carter? Reagan? Bush? Clinton? Bush? John Wayne? (Certainly not Dukakis in a funny-looking hat.)
(2) I’m not a great fan of ethology-based accounts of human behavior, either. My post was meant primarily to toss a different perspective into the brew.
(3) I have no data for what I’m about to say, but it probably would be easy to get some: I tend to doubt that this was a deliberate tactic on McCain’s part. Instead, I suspect that he habitually does this, especially when confronted by an opponent.
(4) As for presidential candidates being more rational than monkeys, here I suspect that you may be off-base. To some extent, I make that observation just as a bit of cynicism about presidential candidates, but to a greater extent I suspect that monkeys operate pretty consistently according to a pretty simple set of decision rules.
Posted by: Lee Sigelman | September 27, 2008 03:59 PM
Interesting thought. And exactly the opposite of David Broder’s piece today about McCain as alpha male.
Posted by: Clyde Wilcox | September 27, 2008 06:05 PM
An older gentleman explained to me that when he was growing up, he was taught not to look a black man in the eye because they were considered inferior, and were not shown that much respect.
Posted by: Luke | September 27, 2008 10:55 PM
I think McCain was showing contempt for Obama by avoiding eye contact in much the same way that Barbara Walters did to McCain on The View.
Posted by: MT Heart | September 28, 2008 07:54 AM
While Luke makes a valid point, I wonder if McCain’s POW experience is revealed by this. During his POW days, did McCain avoid eye contact with his tormenters to perhaps lessen punishment and pain?
Posted by: Shag from Brookline | September 29, 2008 08:53 AM