Early Admissions

That’s Michael Avery, an eighth-grader from Lake Sherwood, California. Like many kids his age, Michael likes to play basketball.
After high school, Michael is going to play basketball in college. Not only that: He’s going to play at a perennial basketball powerhouse, the University of Kentucky.
Note that I didn’t just say that young Michael wants to play basketball in college, let alone at the University of Kentucky. I said he’s going to. In fact, he’s already accepted the scholarship offer that Kentucky coach Billy Gillespie extended to him earlier this month.
Now, I’m a close follower of college basketball. But this development — recruiting kids who are still in junior high — takes me completely off guard. I guess I just haven’t been paying attention, but I had no idea that it had come to this.
It shouldn’t have taken me off guard, because it turns out that this isn’t the first time it’s happened. Within the last couple of years, Southern Cal’s coach, Tim Floyd, has inked two middle school students, and Arizona’s Lute Olson has offered schollies to two kids who hadn’t even started eighth grade yet. And the same week that Michael Avery accepted his offer, Gillespie got another commitment for Kentucky, albeit this time from a veritable grey-beard — ninth-grader Vinny Zollo from Greenfield, Ohio. A recruiting analyst is quoted in Sports Illustrated as saying “It’s like an arms race. You’ve got to offer first.” Apparently this is now becoming standard operating procedure in the cutthroat business of recruiting for big-time college sports.
With so many successful programs pursuing this strategy, it occurs to me that academic departments should consider following their lead. If it”s good enough for the athletics department, then why not for the political science department, too? In fact, in my department there’s a very productive married couple who have two young daughters. These girls obviously have the political science genes and they’re growing up in an academically-oriented home. So why wait? Let’s sign ‘em up as faculty members before Columbia or UCSD hears about ‘em!
Comments
New, in the sense of happening more frequently. Not new, in historic terms. Twenty years ago, Bob Knight offered Damon Bailey, an 8th grader, a scholarship to Indiana. Which he accepted. Knight had been following Bailey since middle school, at least.
Posted by: Jeff J. | May 25, 2008 05:34 PM
Jeff:
I’d forgotten all about Damon Bailey. But I did a little reading just now, and according to what I read he didn’t sign with Indiana until tenth grade, although Knight, among others, had begun recruiting him a couple of years before.
Posted by: Lee Sigelman | May 25, 2008 07:30 PM
Yet another reason to quit following college sports until they own up to the fact that they are professional leagues.
Posted by: Michael O'Neill | May 25, 2008 09:29 PM
Oh, you think that’s bad? Try being “too good” or being a girl that happens to be better than all the boys. Poor girl, she’s just trying to rock out on what she’s good at. Check it out:
http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/2008/05/26/12-year-old-girl-banned-from-all-boys-basketball-league-for-bein/
Posted by: cici | May 27, 2008 04:50 AM
is this a problem?
the only potential downside i can imagine would be if the coaches were to renege on kids after their development tails off.
not that billy gillespie would ever renege on anything like a contract …
Posted by: Joel | May 27, 2008 11:31 AM
FWIW, these are nonbinding verbal commitments and thus are largely for show.
Until Avery signs a national letter of intent (which I think can’t be done until his senior year, his commitment to UK is not worth the paper its printed on.
Posted by: Dan Tarrant | May 27, 2008 01:29 PM
Joel:
Is this a problem? Well, in the grand scheme of what’s wrong with sports in America, I suppose that this would rate pretty far down the list. But it’s just …, well, icky — an example of recruiting excess getting even more excessive.
Dan:
Yes, you’re right of course: This is nonbinding. But if/when a coach backs out of one of these “nonbinding” commitments, you can be sure that rival recruiters are going to use that as a weapon against him: “You’re thinking about committing to Big State U? So did Johnny Jones, but then they pulled their commitment back on him. Same thing could happen to you.”
Posted by: Lee Sigelman | May 27, 2008 02:40 PM
For what is worth, the two young daughters Lee refers to belong to the Midwest Political Science Association (thanks to their parents’ lifetime family membership). If you sign them now, you can contribute less to their research pot.
Posted by: Forrest
|
May 27, 2008 04:27 PM