Los Angeles Times Op-Ed
Apparently, someone at the Los Angeles Times reads The Monkey Cage, because they asked me to write a short piece apropos of these two posts about the “divided” Democrats and the reinforcement effect in campaigns.
The op-ed is here. The gist of the argument is:
Despite ugly battles and policy differences that sometimes seem intractable, the reality is that presidential campaigns tend to unify each party behind its nominee. Political scientists call this phenomenon the “reinforcement effect.”
Some references for works and data cited in the piece:
- The Lazarsfeld, Berelson, and Gaudet study.
- The Pew center poll.
- The piece by Ben Highton. Thanks to Ben for doing some additional data analysis for me.
- The National Election Study data showing that 90% of the public identifies with or leans toward one of the major parties.
- Gary Jacobson’s study of public opinion during the Bush administration.
Comments
Nice job, John. This is exactly the type of op-ed that political scientists should be doing more of, to counteract the schlock that passes for "analysis" by the typical journalist and op-ed writer.
Posted by: Jeff J. | May 25, 2008 05:49 PM
Great job!
Here's to wishing you a great Memorial Day Holiday!
Posted by: Americaneocon | May 26, 2008 02:13 PM
Nice column. Brian Schaffner also had some good data on this topic a while back:
http://ccpsblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/how-common-are-defections-in-general.html
Posted by: Maryann | May 29, 2008 10:09 AM