« What If the US Treated Mexico Like Europe Treated Spain? | Main | Biffos and Buffalos »

The Military as a Macho Culture -- or Not

rambo0.jpg

Anybody got a problem with the idea that military service — from boot camp through combat — breeds hyper-aggressive behavior?

Well, yes. Regina Titunik does.

In an article titled “The Myth of the Macho Military” that appears in the latest issue of Polity, Titunik, an associate professor of political science at the University of Hawaii at Hilo, writes:

The public debate about the incorporation of women in the U.S. Armed Forces has primarily included feminist-insipired critics, who denounce the hostility toward women they perceive is promoted by the military’s masculinist culture, and, alternatively, opponents of the greater inclusion of women in the military, who valorize the exclusivist masculine qualities that many feminists criticize. Although these ideological adversaries differ in their estimation of military culture, they both share — and have reciprocally reinforced — a view of the military as steeped in the traditions and practices of aggressive masculinity. This article shows that the prevailing view of the military as hyper-masculine is misguided. Not unhindered aggressiveness, but camaraderie, discipline, and service are the qualties instilled in soldiers. These qualities foster military effectiveness and counterbalance sexist tendencies producing a complex institutional culture congenial to women in significant respects.

In other words (mine), Rambo is a rogue, not a good soldier, and the military virtues are feminine in nature. An interesting twist that I hadn’t encountered previously.

ADDENDUM: Clyde Wilcox forwarded the following to me — living proof of a turn away from macho in the Spanish military. Click HERE to see for yourself..

Comments

Seeing her title "Associate Prof of Political Scinece," I was prepared for the normal marshmallow drivel. Darn it all, she actually appears to have done some research. If so, she is indeed an island of sanity amidst a sea of lib art mediocrity.

"... and thus military virtues are feminine in nature." I must assume that the author is implying that therefore they are good whereas all masculine traits are bad?!

Is this truly what our modern society has come down to?

Is the emasculated, effeminate male what all you fellows are truly striving for?

God help us all! Ooops, I can mention God with you lot, can I? Or if I do, then I have to refer to her as female.

There is a very interesting discussion of the role the military plays in men's lives in Susan Faludi's book, STIFFED!. As a famous feminist, she was roundly criticized by many for abandoning the cause of women and studying men. She actually does an amazing job throughout the book demonstrating how talking about gendered structural differences are impossible without discussing how men are masculinized in the same way women are feminized.

Anyway, her punchline from the military experience is that one of the failings of the Vietnam war was the abandonment of camaraderie and attachment between officers and enlisted soldiers in WWII and the careerist ambitions of officers (encouraged by military rewards systems) in Vietnam.

Post a comment